4 ms·
I recently upgraded from 60 Hz to 160 Hz monitors and just regular mouse movement/scrolling/etc. is so much smoother. Is it necessary? No, but I won't willingly
by ihattendorf 3y ago
I recently upgraded from 60 Hz to 160 Hz monitors and just regular mouse movement/scrolling/etc. is so much smoother. Is it necessary? No, but I won't willingly go back to 60 Hz, let alone 30 Hz.
- piyh 3y ago30 hz 4k with shitty USB-C dongles is a terrible experience
- fbdab103 3y agoExactly my work setup at the moment. Amazing how quickly my excitement at the new 4k monitor was quelled.
- andrewstuart2 3y agoI've done the same and was pretty dead set on it a while for gaming. And then I got a steam deck which can sometimes dip into the 30s or even 20s and I realized that it does feel jankier but it's definitely an acceptable trade off for something like the mobility of a deck. I'll even crank up graphics on my gaming desktop sometimes now just for eye candy even though it runs closer to 30-45fps.
- strken 3y agoHigh stable fps is important for multiplayer shooters, and presumably other multiplayer or difficult genres where smoothly tracking objects with your mouse is part of the core gameplay. Every time I upgrade my desktop I notice measurably higher stats.