3 ms·
We can ban that on paper and pretend that the problem went away. We cant actually nuke large parts of the GDP. edit: Saw your nuclear energy edit too late. Tha
by cf141q5325 3y ago
We can ban that on paper and pretend that the problem went away. We cant actually nuke large parts of the GDP.
edit: Saw your nuclear energy edit too late. Thats a great example for protectionism / having a frame for subsidies. We still require energy, that section of the GDP didnt just evaporate.
Car legislation is likewise just a driver for higher consumption.
You would need something equally profitable to do for the sub fleet supply chain to ban it.