3 ms·
Oof, this should be pretty humbling to most web developers. I don't even want to reveal my "feature score" from the end of the survey.
by hombre_fatal 3y ago
Oof, this should be pretty humbling to most web developers.
I don't even want to reveal my "feature score" from the end of the survey.
- pwdisswordfishc 3y agoIs it that high? If it’s more that 75%, then indeed shame on you.
- danielvaughn 3y agoYeah this was an eye-opening experience for me. I'm not necessarily humbled, but it points out two things to me (for the record I got a 35%). 1. The pareto effect holds true (I use a little over 20% of html's features) 2. There are a lot of interesting features in html that I should take advantage of more often
- chrismorgan 3y agoLook, most of the surface area it’s talking about is quite new, often still nominally experimental, and quite a bit not supported across all browsers (most commonly Chromium-only, with some Chromium-and-Safari-since-March-but-not-Firefox-yet; and note that none of them have an implementation but lack a Chromium implementation, even though there are a few possible features that meet these criteria—this is one of a few things that show the heavy Chromium bias in the survey).