3 ms·
Exactly and absolutely this. The expectation has been set to human-level understanding and explainability by everyday common people who don't need to know abou
by rvz 3y ago
Exactly and absolutely this.
The expectation has been set to human-level understanding and explainability by everyday common people who don't need to know about how it works. Given it lacks explaining basic logical deduction and even regurgitating its own mistakes, we can't even begin to compare this to humans as it is not the same.
We're just searching for the prompt that can reliably break these LLMs to show their lack of reasoning and at some point eventually someone is going to find it and it will break all of them.
- smolder 3y ago>We're just searching for the prompt that can reliably break these LLMs to show their lack of reasoning What gives you the idea that there's some universal prompt to "break" LLMs? What does a "broken" LLM even look like to you? Do you just mean that it gives back a wrong answer? It's the only interpretation I can come up with, and they already do that all the time.