4 ms·
The pricing isn't even that bad if it helps someone find the right person in a short amount of time. The market for this would be people who don't actively wan
by ratg13 3y ago
The pricing isn't even that bad if it helps someone find the right person in a short amount of time.
The market for this would be people who don't actively want to use tinder, but just get in and out and in a good relationship.
Trying to push this into the hands of the "most active" users is only going to end with the people that shouldn't have these features abusing them to try and control their next victims.
- djohnston 3y agoMeeting someone thru a 500/mo subscription service seems akin to meeting someone at a rich-potential-spouse convention. It’s possible to find the right person , whatever that means, but probably you’re selecting for gold diggers of both sexes.
- willis936 3y agoThis makes me realize that at least some of the users who will pay $500/mo. will not be naturally rich but view it, at least in part, as an investment to get access to rich mates.
- FirmwareBurner 3y ago>The pricing isn't even that bad if it helps someone find the right person in a short amount of time. There's no guarantee of that. It's like paying 500/month for a fortune teller to. You're better off spending that 500/month on grooming, fitness, nutrition and going out socializing, or even an escort. Paying that much for tinder is a scam.
- lionkor 3y agoYou're paying them so they can get you off their platform? I doubt that. If they could filter out perfect matches and only show you ones that keep you on the app, they would
- public_defender 3y agoThis is based on the false assumption that if someone finds a "perfect match" they will stop using tinder. What if finding the perfect match made you _more addicted_ to the app?
- lionkor 3y ago"Perfect" depends on the person, but I meant to say "the one you want to settle with"