3 ms·
You seem to imply that novel things are not statistically highly probable as a chain of thought in a specific context. That's a significant claim and I'm not su
by viraptor 3y ago
You seem to imply that novel things are not statistically highly probable as a chain of thought in a specific context. That's a significant claim and I'm not sure we'd all agree on.
- HAL3000 3y agoI believe one of the main problems with the current generation of LLMs is that they are constrained by statistics. Unless there exists a universal pattern that can address all problems, and we require an enormous amount of parameters and training for it to emerge, these models may never effectively solve the problems that matter most to us and that we find challenging to address on our own.