3 ms·
> unless you wish to bite the bullet that humans are in fact not intelligences merely because they are imperfect. We've already started to cross this line. I'm
by roenxi 3y ago
> unless you wish to bite the bullet that humans are in fact not intelligences merely because they are imperfect.
We've already started to cross this line. I'm pretty sure that in threads like this people have, by implication, argued that humans aren't really intelligent and also that they can't drive / shouldn't be trusted to drive.
Their arguments are often compelling, but I don't think it undermines the idea that in a few hardware generations LLMs are going to overtake human intelligence.
- mdp2021 3y ago> humans are in fact not intelligences merely because they are imperfect > cross this line The line was crossed since forever, since we looked at facts thousands of years ago, since we invented education and school inducing from the experience of experience. Humans have a property of intelligence and they use it with different frequency, ability and result. In fact, we value exercising it and developing it. Humans have intelligence; this idea that some would say that they "are" intelligences sounds completely new to people who have sieved historically disseminated human thought pretty intensively and extensively. It is similar to saying that humans have strength - and it is odd to now find people stating that humans would be strength. What sense would it make? > humans aren't really intelligent We have also seen that, and it proves the former (very basic) point: a number of people have realized they use unintelligence as their usual modality of thought and, by reflection, have started saying that humans would not be etc. But that proves (together with other basic assumptions) that intelligence is something more or less developed that you either use or don't.