4 ms·
Ah, in that case I don't see what relevance your comments have either to my comment or the paper? Surely nobody in the world disputes that an entity with intell
by Smaug123 3y ago
Ah, in that case I don't see what relevance your comments have either to my comment or the paper? Surely nobody in the world disputes that an entity with intelligence that's not always on could still be useful or interesting or wield extraordinary optimisation power, for example (since of course humans are a proof of existence). Showing that some particular entity's intelligence is not always on is… not interesting, in my book, because that's a property of all the intelligences which I've ever interacted with.
- mdp2021 3y ago> could still be useful or interesting «Could still be useful or interesting» outside the realm of engineering an Intelligence that serves the purpose of being definitely intelligent. Try replacing "intelligence" with "strength" to see it (we started with the lever after all): we need the crane to lift the heavy things. Our interest is into lifting the heavy things.