3 ms·

It's not clear what you're trying to communicate here. Yes, it draws a scary picture about the suffering of the "Animal 15". However it doesn't mean it wasn't "

It's not clear what you're trying to communicate here. Yes, it draws a scary picture about the suffering of the "Animal 15". However it doesn't mean it wasn't "necessary".

catchnear4321 3y ago
please provide the definition that is being used, and preferably how one gets to participate in deciding.
- Etherlord87 3y ago
  Why do you put the burden of proof on me? You countered a usage of a word with a quote and no explanation. I took a wild guess on what you could possibly mean, and argue how that would be a non sequitur. If you make an actual argument I might agree, but it's not clear what your argument even is.
  - catchnear4321 3y ago
    > It doesn’t mean it wasn’t “necessary.” your guess seems anything but wild.
    - Etherlord87 3y ago
      You are forcing me to guess. Even after I wrote it's not clear what you tried to communicate, you didn't care to elaborate, instead you're trying to force me to provide definitions. That's a ridiculous way to argue.
      - catchnear4321 3y ago
        the point was the word. the interpretation is the conversation. the argument is your construction. end it whenever you wish.
YeGoblynQueenne 3y ago
"Necessary" for what purpose? From the article: >> Musk’s promise was to revolutionize prostheses and engineer an implant that would allow human brains to communicate wirelessly with artificial devices, and even each other. And from wikipedia: >> In April 2017, Neuralink announced that it was aiming to make devices to treat serious brain diseases in the short-term, with the eventual goal of human enhancement, sometimes called transhumanism.[16][7][17] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink It seems that while there might be medical applications of the developed technology it is not primarily developed for medical purposes. Plugging your brain to your iPhone doesn't sound like a great justification for animal experimentation.

It's not clear what you're trying to communicate here. Yes, it draws a scary picture about the suffering of the "Animal 15". However it doesn't mean it wasn't "necessary".

catchnear4321 3y ago

please provide the definition that is being used, and preferably how one gets to participate in deciding.

Etherlord87 3y ago
Why do you put the burden of proof on me? You countered a usage of a word with a quote and no explanation. I took a wild guess on what you could possibly mean, and argue how that would be a non sequitur. If you make an actual argument I might agree, but it's not clear what your argument even is.
- catchnear4321 3y ago
  > It doesn’t mean it wasn’t “necessary.” your guess seems anything but wild.
  - Etherlord87 3y ago
    You are forcing me to guess. Even after I wrote it's not clear what you tried to communicate, you didn't care to elaborate, instead you're trying to force me to provide definitions. That's a ridiculous way to argue.
    - catchnear4321 3y ago
      the point was the word. the interpretation is the conversation. the argument is your construction. end it whenever you wish.

YeGoblynQueenne 3y ago

"Necessary" for what purpose? From the article: >> Musk’s promise was to revolutionize prostheses and engineer an implant that would allow human brains to communicate wirelessly with artificial devices, and even each other. And from wikipedia: >> In April 2017, Neuralink announced that it was aiming to make devices to treat serious brain diseases in the short-term, with the eventual goal of human enhancement, sometimes called transhumanism.[16][7][17] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink It seems that while there might be medical applications of the developed technology it is not primarily developed for medical purposes. Plugging your brain to your iPhone doesn't sound like a great justification for animal experimentation.