When I listen to CSIS, I know what their biases are: National Security, and more of it, but I don't rank fair.org that highly, and their review of CSIS seems mo

When I listen to CSIS, I know what their biases are: National Security, and more of it, but I don't rank fair.org that highly, and their review of CSIS seems more accusation than evidence. Donations do not always equal corruption, and they mislead in indicating just those donors without indicating other large donors. I'll list just the donors 250k or more M.J. Chung Dalio Philanthropies John and Julie Hamre Jim McNerney Khosravi Family Foundation The Margot and Thomas Pritzker Family Foundation Andrew and Barbara Taylor Byron D. Trott Government of the United States Government of Japan Government of the Republic of Korea Government of the United Arab Emirates Taiwan Amazon Inc. Aramco Bank of America Corporation Chevron Corporation Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC Exxon Mobil Corporation FedEx General Atomics GSK plc HII Leonardo S.p.A Lockheed Martin Corporation Microsoft Northrop Grumman Pratt Industries, Inc. SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Korea Foundation Oceans 5 Open Society Foundations Rural India Supporting Trust Sarah Scaife Foundation SED Fund Smith Richardson Foundation Stanford University The Starr Foundation Stavros Niarchos Foundation Wadhwani Foundation Full lists here: Individual Donations: https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/individuals https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/indi... US and Allied Partners: https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/us-and-alliedpartner-government https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/us-a... Corporate: https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/corporations https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/corp... Foundations: https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/foundation-and-nonprofit https://www.csis.org/about/financial-information/donors/foun... Being NatSec focused, they tend to think more more more, but it is not clear to me that CSIS is appropriately thought of as propaganda.