> For the same kinds of reasons it's better... These examples are not demonstrative of what you are arguing. If you were to instead propose "closing half of al

> For the same kinds of reasons it's better... These examples are not demonstrative of what you are arguing. If you were to instead propose "closing half of all UPS stores in densely populated cities and reallocating them to rural environments" it would be an apt comparison, and equally illogical. There is an argument to be had (maybe) about expanded airline access for less populated geos. There is only an asinine argument to be had about doing that at the cost of reduced service for major population centers.