4 ms·
It contradicts the claim that "content" is what people say because that's what they have to say, to understand what they're posting or reading/viewing. It's no
by johnnyworker 3y ago
It contradicts the claim that "content" is what people say because that's what they have to say, to understand what they're posting or reading/viewing. It's no more significant than is warranted by what we're talking about here. It's fine.
> When did loads of people start saying "shift" instead of "change"?
I'd say "shift" is a subset of "change" and slightly more specific (every shift is a change, not every change is a shift). People didn't change how they speak, some adopted the language of website operators, and then even more people started to parrot that unthinkingly.
- robertlagrant 3y ago> It contradicts the claim that "content" is what people say because that's what they have to say No one's saying it's because they have to say it (who has to say anything?). There was a criticism of Wordpress being a CMS, and I was referring to that. > People didn't change how they speak, some adopted the language of website operators, and then even more people started to parrot that unthinkingly. I don't understand how people didn't change how they spoke if they adopted some language. What's the difference?