4 ms·
We use Github Actions and we just don't have any issues with it outside the first time we set it up for each repo. Then we make 100s of commits a week and it do
by garciasn 3y ago
We use Github Actions and we just don't have any issues with it outside the first time we set it up for each repo. Then we make 100s of commits a week and it does its thing and our work goes live a few seconds later. That's why I love it.
Could things be better? Of course; that's how software is--and this should resonate with most folks on this site. But just because some product isn't infallible doesn't mean we can't love it too.
- moralestapia 3y ago>Then we make 100s of commits a week and it does its thing and our work goes live a few seconds later. Wow, computers doing what they're supposed to do. Pretty impressive ... The UX on GH actions is crap, other CI/CD solutions give you way more control and tooling. GH really needs to step up their game on this one.
- garciasn 3y agoI am not sure why you’re being so snarky, but I did address that it could be better. The thing for us is that we’re already paying for GitHub and Actions are included. I know, for a fact, GH is/was working with stakeholders using their software to get feedback on what could be better. So they are trying! I’m not here being a fanboy by any means; I’m just saying it does what I need it to do and I’m an active user who is pleased with the service provided. YMMV.
- neuromanser 3y ago> we just don't have any issues with it outside the first time we set it up for each repo But that's exactly what a lot of commenters complain about.