3 ms·
the issue is not that it is more, but that it is not significantly less. and that there are a lot of benefits to not commuting, such as more time, better work
by red-iron-pine 3y ago
the issue is not that it is more, but that it is not significantly less.
and that there are a lot of benefits to not commuting, such as more time, better work life balance, less traffic, less emissions, and the ability to lower housing costs -- work in rural Kentucky in a 110k house instead of paying 7x that to be in a Nashville or DC suburb.
- ossm1db 3y agoThe Blue-Ridge Mountains vs a concrete jungle? That's a no-brainer.
- criddell 3y ago> it is not significantly less Maybe the productivity lens isn’t the right one to use. Companies don’t provide benefits like health insurance and weeks of paid vacation because it makes employees more productive. They do it to retain talent.