> Can we just label Psychology in general as pseudoscience? You sure can, and it has the nice bonus of giving psychologists a phenomenon to study: human's driv

> Can we just label Psychology in general as pseudoscience? You sure can, and it has the nice bonus of giving psychologists a phenomenon to study: human's drive to attach pseudo-objective labels to subjective phenomena. > Pretty much all the “findings” that have been popularized recently have all failed replication. "Pretty much" is a nice ambiguous term, might that be a consequence of the underlying methodology you used to determine that fact? What was your methodology anyways?