> I have concluded that it is more likely that he is guilty of these crimes than the various theories in this thread suggesting that he is being unfairly cancel

> I have concluded that it is more likely that he is guilty of these crimes than the various theories in this thread suggesting that he is being unfairly canceled because of his opinions about vaccines I agree, but that isn't enough. The presumption of innocence is important. In the unlikelihood of a trial even more so. > seemingly overwhelming evidence Things aren't always what they seem, and sometimes they are.