4 ms·

> You seem to be suggesting that humans are capable of perceive objective truth for non trivial things. I believe that for situations where a single human has

> You seem to be suggesting that humans are capable of perceive objective truth for non trivial things. I believe that for situations where a single human has enough information and ability to ascertain the truth, most humans deliberately will not make a beeline for the truth. They sort of veer off to the side towards a half truth that better suits their situation. None of this is a conscious choice though. Self deception is completely orthogonal to our ability to ascertain the actual truth. As I said even if we were magically gifted this ability, most choose not to use that ability. Of course this quality lives on a gradient, some people are really good at self deception, others are really bad at it.

fellowniusmonk 3y ago
Obsession with truth isn't necessarily advantageous for success at the species level. I mean who cares if some guy running a convenience store or writing an email client thinks the world is flat? Maybe we just need a small aberrant percentage of the population so there will always be a few people "shorting" the status quo for cash and occasionally preventing extinction.
- corethree 3y ago
  >Obsession with truth isn't necessarily advantageous for success at the species level. It's not just this. It seems as though lying to oneself is so pervasive that it is likely a biological advantage. Meaning not only is obsession with the truth not advantageous but it's actually disadvantageous while the opposite self deception is actually normal and highly beneficial such that this trait has been naturally selected to persist.
- 99_00 3y ago
  We don't have the mental bandwidth or responsiveness to perceive reality. Our brains use shortcuts to observe and think. These lead to errors. We didn't need to be perfect to get to this point. Just good enough to beat the environment and the other meat sacks. Predictiveness of a mental model is the the closest we can get to understanding reality.

fellowniusmonk 3y ago

Obsession with truth isn't necessarily advantageous for success at the species level. I mean who cares if some guy running a convenience store or writing an email client thinks the world is flat? Maybe we just need a small aberrant percentage of the population so there will always be a few people "shorting" the status quo for cash and occasionally preventing extinction.

corethree 3y ago
>Obsession with truth isn't necessarily advantageous for success at the species level. It's not just this. It seems as though lying to oneself is so pervasive that it is likely a biological advantage. Meaning not only is obsession with the truth not advantageous but it's actually disadvantageous while the opposite self deception is actually normal and highly beneficial such that this trait has been naturally selected to persist.
99_00 3y ago
We don't have the mental bandwidth or responsiveness to perceive reality. Our brains use shortcuts to observe and think. These lead to errors. We didn't need to be perfect to get to this point. Just good enough to beat the environment and the other meat sacks. Predictiveness of a mental model is the the closest we can get to understanding reality.