4 ms·
"Your hypothesis should be falsifiable, if not testable" Seriously? There are not strange requirements, and you're ducking the issue by trying to force a pseud
by spankalee 3y ago
"Your hypothesis should be falsifiable, if not testable"
Seriously? There are not strange requirements, and you're ducking the issue by trying to force a pseudo-scientific dialog on this. There are language semantics in play, among many other considerations that I'm sure you're well aware of.
But I don't need to convince you, you're already convinced. Have fun.
- cxr 3y ago> Seriously? Yes, seriously. > There are not strange requirements Huh? > you're ducking the issue I am? How? (What is the issue I'm ducking?) > There are language semantics in play, among many other considerations that I'm sure you're well aware of. What? > I don't need to convince you, you're already convinced. I don't get it. (What am I already convinced of?) You said this wasn't hard. So why does it seem that way?