Nit: CRT certainly offers an explanation, but I don't think it's a particularly good one. Because it always appeals to "systemic injustice", it can't account

Nit: CRT certainly offers an explanation, but I don't think it's a particularly good one. Because it always appeals to "systemic injustice", it can't account for things like 1. the persistence of between group IQ differences amongst children people who have relocated to other countries/culture; 2. the disproportionate success of certain historically-marginalized groups; 3. regression to the mean; and, 4. other factors that marginally influence IQ scores (e.g. single-parent household vs dual-parent household) without engaging in circular reasoning. At best, CRT's explanation is incomplete.