>If I was a member of such a high-risk group, I don't think I would be putting my faith in this org to produce something I can actually consider truly secure.

>If I was a member of such a high-risk group, I don't think I would be putting my faith in this org to produce something I can actually consider truly secure. If I were in such a high-risk group, I wouldn't be putting my "faith" in anyone. Rather, I'd personally make damn sure my sensitive communications couldn't be spied upon. I'd also point out that repressive/authoritarian regimes don't care about the rule of law and/or personal privacy, so they can just come to your house and take you away without any proof that you're working against the state. What's more, they can also confiscate any systems/devices you (or others) may have in an attempt to discover the identities of your "co-conspirators." And they can torture you to give up those names, even if the names you give up aren't actually involved at all. You seem to believe that there's some sort of magical software that can keep someone safe if a government or well-funded private actor wants to get you. News flash: there is no such animal.