3 ms·
At the end of the article it says "InfluxDB said in March this year it had solved the cardinality issue with a new IOx storage engine." Does this mean that in
by qwertox 3y ago
At the end of the article it says
"InfluxDB said in March this year it had solved the cardinality issue with a new IOx storage engine."
Does this mean that in the end it wasn't really necessary to switch to VictoriaMetrics' offering?
- foobiekr 3y agoisn't this like their fourth storage engine? doesn't that get old after awhile?
- heliodor 3y agoOne half-baked thing after another!
- ericb 3y agoThat should read: InfluxDB said in March this year it had solved the cardinality issue with a new IOx storage engine for it's hosting customers only There isn't an influxdb that you can download with cardinality solved.
- coder543 3y agoAs of today, they announced a plan for open sourcing a version of v3, but they make it clear in the article that it won't be a great fit for every existing use case. https://www.influxdata.com/blog/the-plan-for-influxdb-3-0-open-source/ https://www.influxdata.com/blog/the-plan-for-influxdb-3-0-op...