3 ms·
For sure, Emacs with evil-mode is the best of both worlds: deep customization and sane configuration language of Emacs, with the arguably superior modal interfa
by imiric 3y ago
For sure, Emacs with evil-mode is the best of both worlds: deep customization and sane configuration language of Emacs, with the arguably superior modal interface of Vim.
Using mnemonic key bindings is much friendlier than dozens of random key combinations. There's a popular key-chord package[1] that minimizes this discomfort, but without editing modes, users need to be concerned with the chords clashing with their actual text, which is absurd. Modes address this issue gracefully.
I still use some basic combinations like M-x, but I would be completely lost in Emacs if it weren't for evil-mode. <3
The thing with modal UIs is that you want to use them everywhere. So I also enable vi-mode in my shells, and in any application that uses readline.
[1]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/KeyChord https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/KeyChord
- lawn 3y agoHonestly, configuring Neovim with Lua felt more sane than elisp for me.
- SKWR-PLS 3y agoThis is pretty close to how steno [https://www.openstenoproject.org/ https://www.openstenoproject.org/] works in practice and worth learning IMO if you are going to go this far. In fact I have a few emacs-specific chords, but not as many as you might think. The whole experience is a bit like if emacs is now your keyboard, so it happens to go great with emacs. [1]