> Obviously it is the TOML way too? Hence it being the featured example. That another way to express it doesn't change that... It's not even another way to exp

> Obviously it is the TOML way too? Hence it being the featured example. That another way to express it doesn't change that... It's not even another way to express it. The example is a completely different data structure. The initial proposed "TOML way" is an array while the "INI way" is a table. The then corrected "TOML way" IS the equivalent table in TOML. It's a ridiculous strawman along with several other oddities where the author loves to give INI the benefit of its weirdness but then rails against TOML's. The author loves INI and refuses to understand why people wanted and needed TOML to fix its deficiencies. I'd love to tear this thing apart point-by-point, but I think it'd be more cathartic for me than useful to anyone else.