> It's so incredible how two engineers can look at something like this and draw literally the opposite conclusion. Taste is certainly subjective... Well, in su

> It's so incredible how two engineers can look at something like this and draw literally the opposite conclusion. Taste is certainly subjective... Well, in such cases it's likely because two engineers are actually expressing their tastes/beliefs, merely using the thing they look at as a running example. That also means that the running example, ironically, is actually mostly irrelevant to the topic: otherwise it wouldn't have been able to support two opposite conclusions. And in the field of philosophy this phenomenon is even more egregious: you can find e.g. one philosopher arguing that life is meaningless because it's finite, and another philosopher arguing that life has meaning because it's finite.