k. I thought you were applying the "perverse incentive" to Climate Science specifically. If you are saying all research, across all fields, has a "perverse inc

k. I thought you were applying the "perverse incentive" to Climate Science specifically. If you are saying all research, across all fields, has a "perverse incentive", that the entire research system across all disciplines is 'perverse', then I might agree. There was whole thread on HN about this subject recently, sorry, don't have link. BUT. In all the complaining about how research is currently done, I've not seen anybody come up with a credible alternative. You still need funding, still need a way to filter out crap, so still need some reviews by 'experts', that would still have biases.