3 ms·
Hmm my reaction to that is "good marketing." People who have some kind of shtick tend to get more media coverage. Like, was Steve Jobs (turtleneck) covering so
by johndhi 3y ago
Hmm my reaction to that is "good marketing." People who have some kind of shtick tend to get more media coverage.
Like, was Steve Jobs (turtleneck) covering something up? Zuck (t shirts)? Newsom with his Bruce Wayne hair?
- dotnet00 3y agoMaybe it's just because I'm too young to have seen much of Steve Jobs prior to his death, but my impression of coverage surrounding him was that while he did have certain behaviors he insisted on and were often talked about like his turtlenecks, it didn't really fit the stereotype of a tech nerd of the time. Back then "nerd" seemed to have a much more negative connotation and seemed to describe people who were closer to "gross" than "quirky", like the trope of them constantly having a runny nose or sneezing everywhere due to allergies. Steve on the other hand came off as very clean and insistent on dressing nicely, even if in his own style. I feel like Zuck was/is similarly seen as a sham for his entire robotic persona. Perhaps not as a scam, but he certainly never seemed to be all that liked by people. I don't know anything about Newsom to comment on that one. But one other example where I was telling people it was probably a scam beforehand was Nikola. I don't recall what about his behavior did it for me, but something was just off about him in the way SBF was that just screamed deception.