> that effectively user privacy is secondary to child protection i think you should have the right to protect your child from the government, given the nature

> that effectively user privacy is secondary to child protection i think you should have the right to protect your child from the government, given the nature of things that people abuse bureaucracy to achieve today. there are blatant infringements on freedom of religion so the government wants to decide what is and isn't harmful to children why do they want this? because they screwed up with immigration. the elite circles of the government assumed the immigrants would assimilate with time, but that goal has not been achieved. so it seems like they're taking the dystopian approach to fixing a problem rather than admitting they were wrong in the first place, and their dystopian solution is to decide what is "harmful to children"