3 ms·
It basically is a static distribution of an application. The benefits are that, you don’t need to be on a specific version of anything to make this work proper
by aaomidi 3y ago
It basically is a static distribution of an application.
The benefits are that, you don’t need to be on a specific version of anything to make this work properly.
For what it’s worth, flatpaks do share dependencies as much as possible. So that inflated size isn’t going to be replicated for each application.
Also, flatpak _is_ a proper distribution. It doesn’t really do anything fancy other than isolate the dependencies from other tools on your system.
- aeonik 3y agoI have over 4000 packages installed on my Arch Linux system. The only hiccups I have with dependencies are Python, Node, and a few Java projects. Flatpak doesn't solve the dependency problem, it just kicks the can down the road. We need better tools to package and deploy apps that's language and system agnostic, and an easy to use extension system to accommodate this.
- kaba0 3y agoMy gripe is that it doesn’t solve the problem, just pushes it a layer away. Nix is the first package manager that actually gives a proper solution, and it is just much much better and has no space overhead either.