3 ms·
I could literally explain to any old person, common man or child why this is bad quite quickly. I maintain this stance. > It only serves to drive the dislike a
by bArray 3y ago
I could literally explain to any old person, common man or child why this is bad quite quickly. I maintain this stance.
> It only serves to drive the dislike against politics, and thus anti-democratic tendencies.
I'm pro-democracy (in the sense that I don't have a better alternative). You can still disagree with the actions of politicians without being anti-democratic - in fact open disagreement is absolutely fundamental to democracy.
- simmerup 3y agoIf you think you can explain to anyone and convince them easily, you’re likely wrong. Unless you’re some god of charisma. Try and make someone have your opinion, it’s incredibly hard. If they disagree they won’t say so openly but they will vote for politicians trying to make the internet safer
- tgv 3y agoC'est le ton qui fait la musique. You're not disagreeing with the actions of politicians, you're calling all of them "literally the least qualified people to discuss anything tech related". That is an incredibly big lie, and you know it. Yet you wrote it anyway. It's ranting, and the target is representative democracy.