3 ms·
I already see ai replacing jobs of people who tend to handle communication where a friend of mine is doing the work of 5 by generating 90 percent of their comms
by Justsignedup 3y ago
I already see ai replacing jobs of people who tend to handle communication where a friend of mine is doing the work of 5 by generating 90 percent of their comms and hand modifying the output.
Basically if your job involves finding a way to tell people information you are replaceable by current ai models. If your job requires creative thinking, you're safe, ai ain't even close to that.
- OfSanguineFire 3y agoLiterary translation is a field where machines have already threatened creative thinking jobs. Already even some respectable publishers in various countries are machine-translating novels, giving them a light copyediting (not always a deep editing -- the industry has been cutting back on that for years) by someone who doesn't speak the source language, and selling them to the public. It is not that machine translation can already think so creatively, it is just that the cost savings are so great that human creativity is viewed as an unaffordable luxury and the market tolerates the quality hit.
- Justsignedup 3y agoI agree here. This is always the way. I mean literally most companies I work for are all about "how do we take a human process and make it automated, and thus more accurate and better!"