"But it's only anecdotal". Then one learns that most of nutrition research is nothing more than that. No one is doing double-blind randomised nutritional studie

"But it's only anecdotal". Then one learns that most of nutrition research is nothing more than that. No one is doing double-blind randomised nutritional studies for any significant amount of time. Who's got money, time and patience to take thousands of people, lock them in a room and control everything they eat for 2 years? And how would you do double-blind food testing? Of course the entire field is dubious, and then there's the commercial interests. This is to say, actual success stories are probably the best we've got. In my experience, carnivore is excellent, albeit very restrictive for many.