20 ms·
India's biggest tech centers named as cyber crime hotspots
- fareesh 3y agoA lot of these operations have a full fledged office and everything. Unsure whether it's corruption or incompetence or both that prevents them from shutting them down and arresting everyone involved.
- waihtis 3y agono mention of revenue generated by this activity, but it's not far-fetched to suggest it's a significant source of income for locals and thus a blind eye is turned to it, willfully or via bribery
- fareesh 3y agoThe scams target locals too, it isn't limited to international victims only
- shmde 3y agoCops are paid a share most probably for them to continue scamming.
- rightbyte 3y agoThe scam centres probably don't market them self as scam centres if the authorities ask. To prove that they are scamming people is probably quite hard.
- reisse 3y agoThe problem is, these call centers are more outsiders problem than Indian problem. Indian authorities have zero interest in shutting them down. Call centers are not scamming Indians, there are no complaints from local people to police, and probably police gets their share too.
- slowmotiony 3y agoThere's the reputation loss in the eyes of the international community, shouldn't the authorities have some interest in not letting India be perceived as a country that allows theft and organized crime?
- user_7832 3y agoI doubt the Indian Govt doesn’t care about this. But it’s likely that the overworked policeman would rather solve an extra murder case than go after a scam office. Iirc there have been arrests made in the past by the Kolkata police, but it’s probably a whack-a-mole x inadequate resource problem.
- reisse 3y agoHave you seen politicians accusing Indian government in allowing theft and organised crime? Because if not, there is no reputation loss. And I think politicians can close their eyes on the few scammers here and there for the access to Indian markets. Besides, there is an angle of view "rich westerners extortioned our country for centuries, and now are accusing us with the same because of few scammers we're certainly honestly (not) trying to catch" which will be very popular in a certain parts of the world.
- llm_nerd 3y ago"Because if not, there is no reputation loss." Much of the world views India as a corrupt, low-trust society, and it is things like scam centres operating as full blown, in the open operations that built and maintains this reputation. And of course there are costs. China has shot miles ahead of India. Despite all of the advantages India enjoyed it has a GDP per capita below Congo. An economy with a strong scam and corruption basis will always falter. Even if you think this is some sort of poetic justice tax[1] on ugly Westerners, this sort of criminality always goes hand in hand with corruption at all levels of government, in policing, and so on. Always. [1] quoting from the Narcissist's prayer: "And if I did, you deserved it.". Criminals through history have justified their actions by claiming that it is merely righting some historic wrong.
- assholeconny 3y ago[dead]
- oblio 3y agoWhy would they be shut down? They're probably registered as call centers and at least some of their income is declared, thus legal. Especially if they don't target anyone local, who's going to notice, who's going to tell and lose their job or burn bridges?
- fareesh 3y agoThere are plenty of scams targeting locals too though
- saagarjha 3y agoI think this is a somewhat strange way to put together a conclusion. A lot of cybercrime comes from India. A handful of cities are overrepresented in when it comes to software engineering talent. So it seems natural that a lot of people, both good and bad, would be concentrated there? It would be like a report that says "25% of financial crime in the US comes from New York City": well, duh, that's because all the financial activity happens there.
- supriyo-biswas 3y agoThe article confounds cybercrime and the IT industry. People working out of offices in Indian cities are not criminals since they work for legitimate businesses; the concentration of scam operations in said cities is not related to the presence of the IT industry, nor would scammers allocate resources inefficiently by buying office space, which isn’t required to run a criminal enterprise and may be detrimental by way of drawing attention and scrutiny which would have been avoided otherwise. (Downvoters may want to address the problems with my comment; although I feel this is an issue which people feel strongly about, so a rational analysis is often foregone in the pursuit of vindication.)
- mattw2121 3y agoMy understanding of scammers in India has been formed by Youtube videos, where the host "scams the scammer", and from the Reply All podcast (https://gimletmedia.com/shows/reply-all/6nh3wk https://gimletmedia.com/shows/reply-all/6nh3wk). Saying that scammers do not buy office space doesn't seem correct. Are you saying they wouldn't buy (or lease/rent) office space? If so, the Youtube videos and Reply All directly contradict that.
- spacecadet 3y agoEven "mobs" operated as legit businesses. Agreed, to suggest some of the criminals would not attempt the same ruse is nieve.
- 3y ago
- pjmq 3y agoIf you follow Youtubers like Jim Browning that tackle this sort of scam-based cybercrime operations then this will come as absolutely no surprise to you.
- alephnerd 3y agoScam-based cybercrime is an offshoot of the BPO and Call Center industry. This is why cities with a weak software scene but strong BPO scene like Kolkata are highly represented.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoWhat is bpo?
- 55555 3y agoBusiness Process Outsourcing. It typically means call centers / customer support centers / etc.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- imiric 3y agoThis is a rampant industry in the US as well. The Telemarketers mini-series shows how these call centers operate, the scams they run, how police associations are involved, and how the government is basically complicit with what they're doing. This must be even easier and more profitable to operate from a more corrupt country with no regulations or law enforcement of these activities. AI will make this industry even more successful. Telemarketers read from a script anyway, so it's only a matter of time until these scams are fully automated. We're starting to see some of this already, but it will be fully adopted in a few years.
- alephnerd 3y agoThere is regulation for this in India (eg. Each call center needs to be licensed, needs an actual registered owner/point of contact, etc) but if you are doing this with political cover you might be protected. For example, if I am running a scam call center in Kolkata, I'd need to pay off the political party that controls that state - the TMC. And similar stuff happens in other states among all parties. That said, scam calling is a uniquely large industry in Bihar and West Bengal as neither have a significant tech industry, and see very little foreign investment, so there is less incentive for state politicians to crack down on something that generates easy money. Most BPO and Software outsourcing companies in Kolkata and Patna tend to be the old school Indian outsourcing companies that got priced out of Bangalore/Gurgaon/Hyderabad/Pune because they have low margins, and thus pay lower salaries (around $3-7k a year compared to $20-70k a year in Tier 1 cities or product driven companies)
- pomian 3y agoThe interesting question of course, is who is paying for these services.
- decremental 3y ago[dead]
- darkstar_16 3y agoInteresting that they used "Bharat" in the name. Without going political, sounds like an article one can ignore.
- martin_a 3y agoBy having a look at the Wikipedia article [1] I don't see how this name would be a problem?!? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India#Bh%C4%81rata https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India#Bh%C4%81rata
- nsvd 3y agoThe term has become a political dog whistle recently.
- yipbub 3y agoYes, but this doesn't seem like that usage. It's neutral on those issues.
- jowea 3y agoThere's been some political controversy with the right-wing government favouring the Bharat name very recently. Nobody seems to have updated the Wikipedia article yet.
- morbidious 3y agoThese right-wing, left-wing terms have come from the west and violated with a negative connotation from the west. Don't defile anything in the east with these vile implications that the western nazis have come to associate with. We in the east are civilized people, not genocidal barbarians. Thank you.
- econorew 3y ago[flagged]
- morbidious 3y agoWhile the article and research states that majority of fraud comes from UPI (47.1%), it seems as though the fraud involves the victim voluntarily entering their pin to transfer funds to the perpetrator.[1] Perhaps this could be a good time for UPI apps to educate their users on fraudulent transactions. But a part of me thinks this is also trying to boost the credit/debit card industry which has slumped due to UPI's success. I just saw a VISA ad today showcasing their tap to pay feature, which is a strong contender to UPI. [1]: https://www.businesstoday.in/tech-today/trending/story/upi-scams-on-the-rise-heres-how-you-can-protect-yourself-383512-2023-05-30 https://www.businesstoday.in/tech-today/trending/story/upi-s...
- __rito__ 3y agoYou are totally off the mark here. Before UPI, debit cards were there. And people were social engineered to tell the scammer the One Time Password received in their cells required for the withdrawal/transfer. As a person who receieved ~20 such calls and has known half a dozen victims personally, and my dad being a previous public sector bank administrator, I assure you UPI has not changed anything when it comes to scams. The calls go like this: "I am the branch manager of your bank. Your account will be closed in 24 hours due to <totally made up, unplausible problem>. I need you to tell me your 16 digit Debit Card number. Now your CVV, now the OTP. Okay thank you." Thus, less educated and even educated people are scammed. They just ignore (or something) the money amount in the OTP messages. When I receive such calls, I just ask back- "Okay, Mr. Resepected Branch Manager, which branch are you the manager of?", and they mumble or disconnect. One time a guy said, " the main branch". I was like, dude, the "main branch manager" sits with the Prime Minister and such, doesn't call small-time customers like me. And he disconnected. These tell me that the number leaks from not the bank employees/db, but elsewhere. I threatened to call the police on one scammer. He asked to have mercy and not to call the police because it was their business. :') It was 4-5 years ago. Even bank employees and admins receive calls from scammers identifying as bank employees. And, yeah, the government spends a huge amount of money spreading awareness. But the kind of people susceptible to this don't ever learn.
- atlanta90210 3y ago[dead]
- 2Gkashmiri 3y agoI am an attorney based out of srinagar, j&k. I have seen my city's name being tarnished by these scammers and call centers. I am willing to help anyone wanting to put an end to them. I have some bureaucratic access to tax authorities who would be more than welcome to be in the limelight. I have made this offer before on HN so doing it once again. Pro bono work. Anonymous on my part. I want to fuck these bad people up. Let me help you.
- turbo_fart 3y agoYou need to message kitboga on YouTube. He is a big deal in indian call centre anti-scamming. Also he is hilarious and a genius
- 2Gkashmiri 3y agoi have no google account so yeah!!!!
- riddleronroof 3y agoVery odd that criminals go where the money is
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- anukin 3y agoThe headline is misleading once you read the article. The biggest tech centres in India are Bangalore, Hyderabad, Gurgaon and Pune. The centers of crime according to the article are Bharatpur, Mathura and Gurgaon. The cases are rising in Bangalore according to the article. How does these facts convert to the headline of `India's biggest tech centers are cyber crime hot spots`?