5 ms·
That article is absurd. It opens with a mother talking about how she uses bottled water to bathe her child, because the tap water is polluted.Then it goes on t
by Aerroon 3y ago
That article is absurd.
It opens with a mother talking about how she uses bottled water to bathe her child, because the tap water is polluted.Then it goes on to say that residents don't like that Nestle gets to bottle water in the area while their tap water sucks.
I don't see how these two points are related.
This sounds like a problem of incompetent politicians and officials that can't maintain water infrastructure. If anything they should be thankful companies like Nestle exist so that there's at least some source of clean drinking water for them since the city seems incapable of providing it.
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoNestlé has been under constant boycott for 46 years, and couldn't seem to stop abusing mothers and their young children. Flint or not, I will never purchase or use a Nestlé product. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott N.B. Nestlé sold their bottling operations in these USA, and no longer owns Arrowhead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrowhead_Water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrowhead_Water
- doublerabbit 3y agoSame. Recently discovered that Starbucks serves child-labour coffee owned by Nestle. [0] [0] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/mar/01/children-work-for-pittance-to-pick-coffee-beans-used-by-starbucks-and-nespresso https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/mar/01/children-wo...
- rafram 3y ago“The beans are also supplied to Nespresso, owned by Nestlé.” It doesn’t say that the supplier is itself owned by Nestle.