3 ms·
The subsidy is a reduction in insurance premiums. Or, if you want to look at it another way, when insurance payouts are required, the public pays a portion of t
by randomdata 3y ago
The subsidy is a reduction in insurance premiums. Or, if you want to look at it another way, when insurance payouts are required, the public pays a portion of the cost. The math is the same either way, so take your pick.
This is considered a social good as it compels farmers to carry insurance instead of rolling the dice, the latter of which they would be more apt to do if they had to pay the full premium cost. Even with the subsidies, some farmers still opt to roll the dice. But perfect need not be the enemy of good. The split gets enough farmers interested in carrying insurance.
Farmers having insurance is considered a social good as it maintains some stability in food production. If experienced farmers are going bankrupt every time Mother Nature decides to throw a bit of a curve ball, you are at the mercy of the newbies who swoop in to replace them. Indeed, you always need some inflow of newbies to ensure that there are future farmers, and some farmers making mistakes can be absorbed, but when they are all newbies at the same time because everyone else went bankrupt, that is a big risk to the food supply. There is a lot of generational knowledge and experience required to make good management decisions in farming, so it is valuable to have some experienced people remaining in the business.
- ilyt 3y agoWell it aint working coz more and more people are moving away from farming, and the only way to start is to start big as small size farms are just not profitable.
- randomdata 3y ago> and the only way to start is to start big as small size farms are just not profitable. Why do you say that? My small farm – just a traditional grain farm, nothing fancy – is quite profitable. The big farm is a different business model. They are focused on wealth building, leveraging large amounts of debt to keep growing as much as possible, using most of the farm income to cover the debt requirements. In this model you need to be large to survive as the remaining profit margin after paying off the debt is tiny. I have kept the debt to a minimum. That means growth happens at a snail's pace, but it also means that all the money that would have went to the bank ends up in my pocket instead. I'll no doubt have a lot less wealth at retirement, taking the profitability now instead of later, but maybe that's okay? How much do you really need? I don't feel like I'm short of my retirement goals. I just might not be crazy rich in the end. Tradeoffs, as always.