3 ms·
Two logs connected for some purpose near a River == must be a house? Not a raft, which would be much easier and obvious and helpful?
by mlhpdx 3y ago
Two logs connected for some purpose near a River == must be a house? Not a raft, which would be much easier and obvious and helpful?
- xeromal 3y agoI think a raft would still be considered a structure or at least more than just used for fire or spears. It's a purpose-build device that was constructed to achieve a problem. I don't think what it is matters more than it was built in the first place to solve a problem. Those logs look too big for a raft though
- mlhpdx 3y agoIn the video they specifically talk about a platform for building on, and there is mention of this find contracting conclusions about the nomadic nature of “folks” at the time. Both indicate they went straight to the abode idea. The youngest of children will start assembling logs near shore when swimming at a lake. The crossing of the logs would help stabilize them so crossing would be safer and dry, which is critical in transporting some goods. The raft is more consistent with existing evidence, but less compelling to the modern world which expects homes to have floors.
- xeromal 3y agoI guess my point was less about what the structure is and more that it'd a significant discovery regardless of what it is.