3 ms·
It provides one half of that, the article provides the other half. > And neither is any other device maker. This industry is full of "feel good" messaging, but
by benatkin 3y ago
It provides one half of that, the article provides the other half.
> And neither is any other device maker. This industry is full of "feel good" messaging, but generates 50 million metric tons of e-waste each year.
And with my links it shows that these companies are doing feel-good messaging. I just thought I would call them out specifically.
The link in the article goes in depth on how far it is from sustainability for one part of their operation, despite trying harder than most https://frame.work/sustainability https://frame.work/sustainability
- kccqzy 3y agoThis is comparing apples and oranges. The article is talking about a wider sense of sustainability that includes e-waste. The links you posted are merely talking about carbon neutrality, which is a very small subset, and admittedly easier to achieve.
- benatkin 3y agoa false carbon neutrality It's not apples and oranges though. They are both about sustainability. https://3egroup.com.au/news-insights/coming-to-terms-with-sustainability-terms-net-zero-vs-carbon-neutral-vs-carbon-negative-vs-carbon-positive-what-do-they-mean-exactly/ https://3egroup.com.au/news-insights/coming-to-terms-with-su...
- Alupis 3y agoKeep it down please - not everyone has queued into the scam that is carbon credits yet. Pay some 3rd party money with the promise they're offset your carbon emissions or plant trees, then go back to polluting however you want. It's quite the thing... but you get to claim you're Carbon Neutral in the meantime!