Since Calvium got rewarded for being "Completely Enabling for _______ encryption chips used in VPN and Web encryption" and then lists these on its Nitrox III an

Since Calvium got rewarded for being "Completely Enabling for _______ encryption chips used in VPN and Web encryption" and then lists these on its Nitrox III and Nitrox V (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6Y_zDQWgAAj96s?format=jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6Y_zDQWgAAj96s?format=jpg) AES (128/192/256 CBC, GCM) Triple-DES (CBC, 3-key) SHS (SHA-1/256/384/512) HMAC (SHA-1/256/384/512) RSA (KeyGen, SigGen and SigVer; PKCS1 V1 5; 2048bits) ECDSA (PKG, SigGen and SigVer; P-256, P-384, P-521) CTR DRBG (AES-256) HASH DRBG (SHA-512) CVL Component (IKEv2, TLS, SSH) CKG (vendor affirmed) Does that imply that the NSA may have kleptographic (algorithm substition, or secondary key) attacks or something different for all of these?