> Although the author gives themself an escape hatch with "augmented" because it seems extremely evident that almost everything will have some small level of "A

> Although the author gives themself an escape hatch with "augmented" because it seems extremely evident that almost everything will have some small level of "AI" input (arguably it already does... spellcheckers have been around for quite a while.) (author here) i guess it could be viewed as an escape hatch, but fwiw I was just directly thinking about the HN Recap podcast, the inciting reason for having this interview in the first place - HN Recap draws its source material from the human writers and commenters on this site, and curation from the voters, but otherwise every word is AI generated. I would consider this a step above autocomplete and spellcheck and that passes my "it's an AI podcast" bar - particularly because there exist prior HN recap podcasts done by humans that did a worse and less consistent job.