It is valid to argue the opinion that some businesses should not record or store chats, or should use E2E encryption. It is also valid to argue the opinion tha

It is valid to argue the opinion that some businesses should not record or store chats, or should use E2E encryption. It is also valid to argue the opinion that a law could be beyond a certain threshold of immorality where a business should prefer the risk of a federal lawsuit over complying. It is also valid to argue the opinion opposite to these two opinions. My point being that it is the antithesis of reason to assert that these opinions simply can not be held, or are somehow fundamentally invalid.