4 ms·
When would a 90% accuracy on a dataset like mnist ever be useful? And I mean useful as in usable for actual products or software. especially considering mnist i
by mardifoufs 3y ago
When would a 90% accuracy on a dataset like mnist ever be useful? And I mean useful as in usable for actual products or software. especially considering mnist is more of a toy dataset.
I think that's why machine learning is the way to go for this type of detection, why go with anything else than a CNN (in this case) when it is now trivial to set up and train? Again, unless it's just to mess around with, 90% mnist accuracy is not useful in the real world
- vannevar 3y agoI don't think the point was that you should use logistic regression on MNIST. In lesser-known problems, say a custom in-house model, if you don't try the simpler approach first, you'll never know that your more complex solution is not worth the extra expense, or is actually worse than a simpler, cheaper model. MNIST is well-known to have nearly perfect solutions at this point, but for most novel problems, the data scientist has no idea what is theoretically possible. Now, you can say that CNNs or other techniques are easily accessible these days, and almost trivial to set up. But they may not be trivial to train and run in terms of compute in the real world.