3 ms·
That makes sense. I've probably been thinking more about remote network protocols, where the time it takes for a message to reach its destination will be so lar
by saghm 3y ago
That makes sense. I've probably been thinking more about remote network protocols, where the time it takes for a message to reach its destination will be so large that the overhead for a few extra bytes per message is negligible; for a protocol used solely within a given local system, there would be a much lower threshold of acceptable overhead.