3 ms·
> It seems no answer can satisfy you. What does this add? > intangible reasons that cannot be falsified. I assure you there is nothing intangible about a cle
by pphysch 3y ago
> It seems no answer can satisfy you.
What does this add?
> intangible reasons that cannot be falsified.
I assure you there is nothing intangible about a clear pattern of high-profile assassinations, to say nothing of other related global events.
> You're vacillating between wanting more powerful international organizations, but at the same time don't want international organizations wielding their power in ways you personally don't approve of
You really can't see the difference between overt, ratified international institutions, and shadowy, nameless, violent special-interest groups? Come now.
- infamouscow 3y agoI acknowledge there's pattern of high-profile assassinations in history that raise questions and seem interconnected. However, attributing them to a small covert group is a logical leap. What would convince you they're not conspiring together? As for international organizations, my point is that even ratified and official organizations are not immune to political pressures and special interests. How do we ensure transparency, efficacy, and fairness when the existing entities can't do that sufficiently well to maintain unipolarity?