You seem to be asserting some categorical difference between Bezier curves and pixels, likely because most output devices work in terms of pixels. But they're a

You seem to be asserting some categorical difference between Bezier curves and pixels, likely because most output devices work in terms of pixels. But they're actually both just drawing primitives, and neither one is capable of representing perfect circles. > the Bézier inaccuracy has nothing to do with rasterization Obviously, because rasterization refers to pixels and has nothing to do with Bezier curves. On the other hand, that inaccuracy has everything to do with Bezierization. > there's a base level inaccuracy and then your rasterization brings a whole new, different inaccuracy into play. Yes, stacking two inexact transformations will result in more inaccuracy than a single one. Since you seem to be attached to your analogy - it's more like a person making the argument that humans can't fly unassisted, while showing a picture of a pig as an example of flying, and I'm pointing out that pigs can't fly either.