3 ms·
I don't think so. It's in line with the classical definition of masculinity. What is not feminine. So nothing shocks me with that sentence.
by _ache_ 3y ago
I don't think so. It's in line with the classical definition of masculinity. What is not feminine. So nothing shocks me with that sentence.
- diogenes4 3y ago> It's in line with the classical definition of masculinity. What is not feminine. This is not only a very western perspective but a very modern one. Regardless, the principles of liberating people from gender roles applies just as well to a gender role applied only to men.