Which is what I said, no? > In C/C++, Rust, etc it makes sense to use an array of function pointers as it degrades into a jump table [...]. Same goes for an ex

Which is what I said, no? > In C/C++, Rust, etc it makes sense to use an array of function pointers as it degrades into a jump table [...]. Same goes for an exhaustive and non-fallthrough switch statement. I have no doubt that non-exhaustive (sparse) switch statements can also be optimized in compilers today; the more important portion is the non-fallthrough aspect.