4 ms·
https://www.google.ca/search?q=pull+to+refresh https://www.google.ca/search?q=pull+to+refresh That isn't infinite scroll, and it's pretty clear that the sudden
by huggyface 15y ago
https://www.google.ca/search?q=pull+to+refresh https://www.google.ca/search?q=pull+to+refresh
That isn't infinite scroll, and it's pretty clear that the sudden awareness of this interface technique rose quite quickly.
- anonymoushn 15y agoInfinite scroll allows you to scroll past the bottom to see older content. Pull to refresh allows you to scroll past the top to see newer content. I'm having a hard time finding the non-obvious aspect of the invention. After looking around a bit, it seems like the non-obvious use people are employing is applying the concept even where the content isn't a list which will expand at the top when you refresh, but rather some other form of content that will be replaced with the up-to-date version when you refresh.
- politician 15y agoThis is a silly patent. Imagine that you're looking at the months view of any calendar app in existence. Scroll, tap, swipe left? Older months. Scroll, tap, swipe right? Newer months. Rotate 90 degrees and this concept is novel? Egads.
- huggyface 15y agoYour comparison has quite literally nothing to do with this patent, beyond beyond a method of touch interface. It is not simply rotated 90 degrees. Further it's interesting how people could claim the obviousness of this despite the fact that there isn't a single known use before twitter started doing it (where it was then picked up by others). That's a pretty remarkably clear indication that it isn't obvious. 99% of software patents are bullshit that should never have been granted, with this patent being among them. However this patent is no worse, and is arguably better, than most that so many actually defend on here (hyperlinking phone numbers, for instance).
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]