3 ms·
But have you used 2-way binding with a more modern framework? Or are you still hanging on to your experience with a defunct framework like Knockout from over a
by ttfkam 3y ago
But have you used 2-way binding with a more modern framework? Or are you still hanging on to your experience with a defunct framework like Knockout from over a decade ago?
And don't get me started on React's "put all the logic you want in our templating language that doesn't even target HTML5" elephant-footgun. Oh! Sorry! Forgot that React's footguns are aKeats elegant and reasonable while everything else's footguns are dealbreakers.
- RussianCow 3y ago> And don't get me started on React's "put all the logic you want in our templating language that doesn't even target HTML5" elephant-footgun. Sorry, but how is JSX a footgun? I have a lot of issues with React, but JSX doesn't even come close to making the list.
- ttfkam 3y agoYou obviously keep the amount of JS logic to a minimum in your templates. I have encountered many React codebases that did not do this.