3 ms·

I made no comment about Britain. I was talking about Winston Churchill, the singular person. That is your infer, not my imply.

• skippyboxedhero 3y ago
  You don't understand what inference is. Merely stating that you didn't mean to infer it isn't relevant.
  • corobo 3y ago
    When a statement is made by me, you would be inferring and I would be implying. In this case though I am saying I did not imply what you inferred. My comment is regarding the individual, not the country he was in charge of.
    • skippyboxedhero 3y ago
      > When a statement is made by me, you would be inferring and I would be implying. Correct, you have just explained that you don't understand what inference is.
      • corobo 3y ago
        I'm open to being wrong mate, any chance you could correct me rather than just say I don't know? That's kinda super tedious. I even went to a dictionary and asked chatgippity to double check lmao. Whatever you're implying, I'm unable to infer :)
      • RoyalHenOil 3y ago
        I'm just an onlooker here, but you have been misunderstanding/misusing the word "infer" in this thread. So let's put that word aside and focus on understanding what the person above you is trying to communicate. They made an accusation against Churchill, and you responded with a defense of Britain. This reveals that you misinterpreted their comment. They wish to correct your musunderstanding and make it clear that they were not talking about Britain, only Churchill.