4 ms·
>And then micro-focusing on climate science seeming to assert that this one particular field is much more biased than all other fields. I don't believe I asser
by Clubber 3y ago
>And then micro-focusing on climate science seeming to assert that this one particular field is much more biased than all other fields.
I don't believe I asserted climate science was much more biased. I was just acknowledging the perverse incentive. I did assert it was very well funded though.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agok. I thought you were applying the "perverse incentive" to Climate Science specifically. If you are saying all research, across all fields, has a "perverse incentive", that the entire research system across all disciplines is 'perverse', then I might agree. There was whole thread on HN about this subject recently, sorry, don't have link. BUT. In all the complaining about how research is currently done, I've not seen anybody come up with a credible alternative. You still need funding, still need a way to filter out crap, so still need some reviews by 'experts', that would still have biases.