2 ms·

> I disagree with this approach That is not actually relevant to the point. > So, how can you even try to defend this design I'm doing no such thing, I'm poi

> I disagree with this approach That is not actually relevant to the point. > So, how can you even try to defend this design I'm doing no such thing, I'm pointing out that your reasoning is faulty: dogfooding does not help when the behaviour is logical and obvious to the designer-cum-user, and same with reviewing.

tester756 3y ago
>dogfooding does not help when the behaviour is logical and obvious to the designer-cum-user, and same with reviewing. While I can agree with dogfodding, then review doesn't have to be done just by the people that are responsible for the design/impl. You can have external reviewers for (let's call it) sanity check